Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concurrent mashing #380

Closed
Koeng101 opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Concurrent mashing #380

Koeng101 opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
easy A quick and easy fix! enhancement New feature or request low priority Would be nice to fix, but doesn't have to happen right now/there are more important things stale wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@Koeng101
Copy link
Contributor

In my sequencing pipeline, currently the slowest part is the sequence mashing, running on one core. It would be nice to be able to do this concurrently, built in: because the primary use case is probably going to be mashing a LOT of sequences.

What I am specifically looking for:

  1. Many reads input, grouped together. Each read group targets a certain template, but we don't know which one.
  2. Many templates input
  3. The most likely template for the reads as an output
@Koeng101 Koeng101 added enhancement New feature or request needs-triage An issue that needs to be triaged easy A quick and easy fix! low priority Would be nice to fix, but doesn't have to happen right now/there are more important things and removed needs-triage An issue that needs to be triaged labels Sep 27, 2023
@TimothyStiles
Copy link
Collaborator

@Koeng101 that implementation is super naive and I'd recommend it be tuned up a little for performance before it being merged into main with things like what you're suggesting built on top of it. Check out details on #344.

Copy link

This issue has had no activity in the past 2 months. Marking as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 26, 2023
@TimothyStiles TimothyStiles added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy A quick and easy fix! enhancement New feature or request low priority Would be nice to fix, but doesn't have to happen right now/there are more important things stale wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants