You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Only as much as when I edit pre-boxes BB sites, sometimes there will be columns in a row and they are held within a "group". Right clicking the group in the navigator doesn't allow options like duplicate which appear on rows, modules and columns which means making a grid of 2 rows of 3 columns isn't as easy to achieve.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if there was a way to right click these "groups" or rows with a group and columns and click an option to convert to the new "Box" while preserving the layout as it was.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Manually rebuilding these rows with boxes.
Additional context
Maybe this is already on the roadmap but if not, I think it would be a great feature to help people gradually transition to using boxes without all of the manual leg work.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Only as much as when I edit pre-boxes BB sites, sometimes there will be columns in a row and they are held within a "group". Right clicking the group in the navigator doesn't allow options like duplicate which appear on rows, modules and columns which means making a grid of 2 rows of 3 columns isn't as easy to achieve.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if there was a way to right click these "groups" or rows with a group and columns and click an option to convert to the new "Box" while preserving the layout as it was.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Manually rebuilding these rows with boxes.
Additional context
Maybe this is already on the roadmap but if not, I think it would be a great feature to help people gradually transition to using boxes without all of the manual leg work.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: