-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reg\Transfers - Edit mode of Transfer form #2447
Comments
@zoeyli-46 it would probably be helpful if we were to have a separate wireframe for Transfers when they're being edited. |
I created a wireframe, and added some additional AC. Let me know what you think! @andrea-williams |
thanks @zoeyli-46 ! Just noting that when the page is in Edit mode, we'll need to add another button so that users can entirely cancel the transfer if needed. But if you're super busy with other things don't worry about the wireframe - I think we can get by without it. |
Added in AC x wireframe which includes cancelling the transfer button |
Should we hide the edit button when the status is set to "Transferred"? |
definitely. Once the Transfer has taken place, editing should not be an option. |
Blocked by #2427 , #1949
Description:
As an internal user, I need to be able to edit a Transfer event if the status is "To be transferred" (i.e., the effective date of transfer is still in the future)
Acceptance Criteria:
Given I am an internal user
When I look at a Transfer (#1713 ) with a status of "To be transferred"
Then it is in disabled mode, and I have the option to edit certain fields by clicking the "Edit Details" button
I also see a "Cancel transfer button"
Given that I clicked "Cancel transfer"
A confirmation modal pops up.
Wireframe
Given that I clicked edit details
Wireframe
Development Checklist:
Definition of Ready (Note: If any of these points are not applicable, mark N/A)
Definition of Done (Note: If any of these points are not applicable, mark N/A)
Blocked By/Blocking
Notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: