-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should we use master branch or stable version? #2144
Comments
here's the diff of main vs the last release. There are mostly a lot of test fixes and updating to use some of the more recent upstream dependencies. We should be cutting a new release on Monday after I get some more testing updates done this weekend. Depending on what features you need most of the changes since 0.5.2 are likely to not affect you.
|
Thank you! I am mainly wondering a general question: should we use master or stable as a routine (not specific to this release)? |
@fzyzcjy IMO, most users can use the latest stable version. If you want access to bleeding-edge features as they are added, then it might make sense to check out master, but as you noted, it may be less stable. In short, in depends on how you intend to use the package! |
What piece of documentation is affected?
Hi thanks for the library! Usually it is suggested to use stable version of a package (e.g. "release v0.5.2"), but it seems the README here uses the master branch, and the docker image is also mainly about latest master. Therefore, I wonder whether it is OK to use the master branch? i.e. will it be too unstable?
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
(see above)
Additional Information
No response
Acknowledgements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: