-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem about different number of input views on Replica dataset #79
Comments
Hi, I think we trained for the same epochs with using 100 views in the replica dataset. Can you get good results with all the views (100)? |
Yes ! I have already reproduced your results (using 100 views, with training 400 epochs), and that's very good ! |
Oh, could you try on other scene of the replica dataset? I haven't test 10 views on this scene but only on the scene we show in the supp. though I think it should also work. Could you using MLP or hash grids? |
I used MLP. I will try it on other scenes, Thanks ! |
Hello, what's your results on other replica scenes when reducing the input views? |
Hi ! Thanks for the wonderful work !
I noticed that you have Figure 6 in the supplementary material discussing model performance for different input views.
I want to know how you select a part of the views for the same scene. I randomly selected 30 views for Replica scan1, trained for 400 epochs, with depth, normal cues, but the result is very poor. In addition, I also want to know how many epochs are suitable for training when I reduce the input views.
1.shape reconstruction result in meshlab (400 epochs, 30 views)
2.rendering results (400 epochs, 30 views)
Any help would be greatly appreciated !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: