-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adaptability of the CUDA implementation #71
Comments
Hi, I am not familiar with Scaffold-GS codebase. Could you be more specific about what you changed? What is the strategy for adding new points? |
Hello, thanks for the reply. I observed the same decrease when integrating the GOF CUDA implementation into the original 3DGS. The only change I made was switching the rendering function. |
OK, I think switching to original 3DGS should work out of box. Do you also use the 3D smoothing filter? |
I didn't add the 3D filter but keep the 2D filter in the CUDA part. |
OK, maybe you should set the kernel_size to 0. |
I already set it to 0. |
Then I guess the only difference is the 3D smoothing filter. Maybe you can also try to use it. |
Got it, I'll have a try. Thanks again for the reply. |
Connected to the CUDA version, is there a reason why this project (and mip-splatting) is using CUDA version 11.3 and not 11.6? Will it work if I install CUDA 11.6 packages instead of 11.3? (IIRC, original 3DGS uses 11.6) |
Hi, I think both cuda version work. |
Hello Zehao,
Congratulations on your impressive work!
I attempted to integrate the GOF CUDA implementation into the original 3DGS and Scaffold-GS. However, I noticed a decrease in rendering quality, approximately 1 dB drop in PSNR. The issue seems to come from the densification. Adding points in distant regions appears to be challenging, resulting in a blurred background. Please see the attached image for reference.
Do you have any insights or suggestions regarding this issue?
Best,
Mulin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: