-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
smoke-test failures: Win32 #258
Comments
[snip]
[snip] My very preliminary analysis of the failure output from the Win32 smoke-test run suggests that some of the failures are for reasons similar to what we've encountered in our development on *nix.
Some diagnostic hunts that may be useful.
|
Poke at it with a few minor fixes |
This was my result on a interactive run:
|
note that |
What do you mean by an "interactive" run?
If you can post verbose output for any of those, I can stare at them overnight. Thanks for your investigation. |
Results look good. See attachment. The bottom report is what I believe is the most recent smoke-test run on Perl 5 blead run on this OS/OS version/compiler/compiler version combination. The middle report is the next-to-most-recent smoke-test run on the simulation of Perl 7 branch run on this host. cpan/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/t/02-xsdynamic.t and dist/Net-Ping/t/450_service.t are frequently observed failures on this host, but all the other are attributable to our previous lack of testing on Win32. The top report is the most recent smoke-test report on the Perl 7 simulation branch. Note that now the only files failing are ones also always or intermittently failing on Perl 5 blead. We, like Perl 5, are handicapped by the fact that this host is the only one steadily submitting smoke-test reports on MSWin32. Thank you very much. |
That's not really true. All of these actions test windows. https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-mingw64 https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-msvc100-x86 https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-msvc142-amd64 |
On 9/4/20 7:07 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
That's not really true. All of these actions test windows.
https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-mingw64
https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-msvc100-x86
https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-msvc142-amd64
Todd, at all 3 of those URLs the last report was two months ago. So
there don't appear to be any reports on our simulation branch:
https://github.com/perl/perl5/actions?query=workflow%3Asmoke-windows-mingw64+branch%3Asmoke-me%2Fjkeenan%2Fcumberland-blues
|
@jkeenan can we close this case or are we viewing more failures on windows? |
On 9/14/20 5:03 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
@jkeenan <https://github.com/jkeenan> can we close this case or are
we viewing more failures on windows?
@atoomic <https://github.com/atoomic> I suspect we aren't going to get
any more smoke-test reports for this particular Merge Candidate tag. I'd
like to do that after we resolve #267
<#267>.
An additional consideration here: kl
|
On 9/14/20 5:03 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
@jkeenan <https://github.com/jkeenan> can we close this case or are
we viewing more failures on windows?
@atoomic <https://github.com/atoomic> I suspect we aren't going to get
any more smoke-test reports for this particular Merge Candidate tag. I'd
like to do that after we resolve #267
<#267>.
An additional consideration: https://perl5.test-smoke.org has been down
since approx Sep 06 -- so our ability to get reports is hampered.
jimk
|
We pay for our failure/inability to test on Windows so far.
Smoke test report: http://perl5.test-smoke.org/report/117911
Log file: http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/mswin32-win2000/smoke-me/James%20E%20Keenan/log005643c4ee4b5d0cd729c01372d3b3fc59752d3a.log.gz
A gzipped file containing the relevant part of the log for the non-threaded, non-debugging configuration can be found here.
@atoomic, @toddr please review.
Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: