Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ADSpinnaker vs ADAravis #10

Open
LeeYangLBLBCS opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

ADSpinnaker vs ADAravis #10

LeeYangLBLBCS opened this issue Aug 9, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@LeeYangLBLBCS
Copy link

I've been using ADAravis for my FLIR camera.
Recently, I saw ADSpinnaker has been upgraded to 3-4 (from my last attempt with 3-1).
Does the latest ADSpinnaker IOC offer performance advantage over ADAravis?
@LeeYangLBLBCS
Copy link
Author

ADSpinnaker's cam1:ArrayCounter_RBV does not behave the same as that of ADAravis. The difference I found causes the broadcast image frame number discrepancy when I enabled ADZMQ (https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/ADZMQ).
According to the discussion on this thread paulscherrerinstitute/ADZMQ#5, the image frame number is tied to NDArray's UniqueId.
When "UniqueId mode" is selected to be "Driver" in ADSpinnaker MEDM, the ZMQ frame number always increments, even after the cam1:ArrayCounter_RBV has been reset to 0.

image

This is not how ADAravis IOC behaves, which is the desired behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@LeeYangLBLBCS