Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trial symengine in modcc #57

Closed
halfflat opened this issue Oct 31, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Trial symengine in modcc #57

halfflat opened this issue Oct 31, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@halfflat
Copy link
Contributor

halfflat commented Oct 31, 2016

How easy to incorporate or robust is symengine?

Let's trial it for the computation of the derivative in the cnexp processing in modcc.

@vkarak
Copy link
Contributor

vkarak commented Nov 1, 2016

I have just had a look at it. It is not very well documented, I've gone through some of the unit tests to understand how it works. It seems to support a wide range of mathematical expressions. I suppose you mean constructing the expressions AST using this library or also adopting its front-end syntax for expressions?

@halfflat
Copy link
Contributor Author

halfflat commented Nov 4, 2016

Yep, considering it for the AST expression manipulation and algebra. May well fall under task #64.

noraabiakar pushed a commit to noraabiakar/arbor that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2019
* Update running.rst.
* Tweak docs/makefile (specify docdir; rename clean; add force target).
* Deuglify ``code`` rendering with some custom CSS.
@halfflat
Copy link
Contributor Author

halfflat commented Feb 4, 2021

Conclusion: we do things with AST manipulations now, and will rejig everything when arblang lives.

@halfflat halfflat closed this as completed Feb 4, 2021
akuesters pushed a commit to akuesters/arbor that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2021
* Loading dynamic catalogues.

* Fix compile error.

* Fix simulation.

* Add examples.

* Ignore.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants