Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put back user privacy protections for mergers/acquisitions #30

Open
mattflaschen opened this issue Aug 26, 2012 · 2 comments
Open

Put back user privacy protections for mergers/acquisitions #30

mattflaschen opened this issue Aug 26, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@mattflaschen
Copy link
Contributor

The old privacy policy had:

"Your personal information
-and other data collected by us may be transferred to another company that has
-acquired our stock or assets, for example, as a result of a sale, merger,
-reorganization, dissolution or liquidation. If such a transfer occurs, the
-acquiring company's use of your personal information will still be subject to
-this Privacy Policy."

The new says personal info can be shared:

"In connection with, or during negotiations of, any merger, sale of App.net assets, financing or acquisition of all or a portion of our business to another company"

with no clause about "will still be subject to this Privacy Policy". Please put back this protection from the original.

You should also not allow transfer of personal information during negotiations, which is another unfortunate addition. Sharing aggregated information during negotiation would be okay.

@jimrhiz
Copy link

jimrhiz commented Aug 27, 2012

Recall that the Core Values say:

We are selling our product, NOT our users.
We will never sell your personal data, content, feed, interests, clicks, or anything else to advertisers. We promise.

This would be a hollow promise if our personal data are sold to some other company that then sells them to advertisers. Although the new privacy policy Matt quotes does say "Remember, we don't share your information with advertisers", it offers no protection against an indirect sale of our personal information to advertisers as a result of a merger, acquisition, etc during which the original "we" who made the promise disappear or change identity. This is one of the reasons why the Core Values need to be entrenched in the TOS as I advocate in issue #28, so that they cannot be weakened or abandoned.

@katcaverly
Copy link

"Core Values need to be entrenched in the TOS"

this is so very important, that it cannot ever be left to chance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants