You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This algorithm adds collisions for safety reasons, which can result in a reverse result of 1: N. This may result in different plaintext encrypted ciphertexts being the same, for example, A encrypted result is C, and B encrypted result is also C. In this case, when querying A, there should be both A and B in the query result, and the normal result should not have B.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
10 and 12 using CHAR_ DIGEST_ LIKE encrypt algorithm, all results are 01.
When querying 0, the encrypted result of 0 is 1, and both 10 and 12 will be queried.
10 and 12 using CHAR_ DIGEST_ LIKE encrypt algorithm, all results are 01. When querying 0, the encrypted result of 0 is 1, and both 10 and 12 will be queried.
If a 1 -> N digest algorithm is used, this may be unavoidable. For short texts, should another hash algorithm be designed?
This algorithm adds collisions for safety reasons, which can result in a reverse result of 1: N. This may result in different plaintext encrypted ciphertexts being the same, for example, A encrypted result is C, and B encrypted result is also C. In this case, when querying A, there should be both A and B in the query result, and the normal result should not have B.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: