-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Isabelle/HOL translation: recursive translation of the whole project #2977
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d1f66bd
to
600e96d
Compare
The CI fails because of a bug in GHC:
The problem is with one of the optimizations (it works with optimizations turned off). Possibly related: |
600e96d
to
8a3c76c
Compare
Since GHC 9.8.2 has a bug which blocks our development (see #2977 (comment)), I made a PR to update to GHC 9.10.1. Because stackage doesn't yet support GHC 9.10.1, I had to add some explicit dependencies and use `allow-newer-deps` in `stack.yaml`. I think we should merge this not to get blocked by the bug, and later clean up `stack.yaml` when GHC 9.10.1 becomes supported on stackage. --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Cadman <[email protected]>
8a3c76c
to
0daacca
Compare
0daacca
to
2deb098
Compare
0f4c6c8
to
61fb2e7
Compare
61fb2e7
to
d855023
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to postpone merging this until I can resolve:
as we may need to rollback the GHC 9.10.1 upgrade if I cannot resolve it.
This PR is blocked until we can solve: Which probably means we need to wait for stackage nightly to update to GHC 9.10.1. |
The problem persists with GHC 9.8.3 |
d855023
to
1967265
Compare
1967265
to
76ede4c
Compare
Since GHC 9.8.2 has a bug which blocks our development (see #2977 (comment)), I made a PR to update to GHC 9.10.1. Because stackage doesn't yet support GHC 9.10.1, I had to add some explicit dependencies and use `allow-newer-deps` in `stack.yaml`. I think we should merge this not to get blocked by the bug, and later clean up `stack.yaml` when GHC 9.10.1 becomes supported on stackage. --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Cadman <[email protected]>
76ede4c
to
342c820
Compare
Since GHC 9.8.2 has a bug which blocks our development (see #2977 (comment)), I made a PR to update to GHC 9.10.1. Because stackage doesn't yet support GHC 9.10.1, I had to add some explicit dependencies and use `allow-newer-deps` in `stack.yaml`. I think we should merge this not to get blocked by the bug, and later clean up `stack.yaml` when GHC 9.10.1 becomes supported on stackage. --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Cadman <[email protected]>
c3dbace
to
deca795
Compare
Since GHC 9.8.2 has a bug which blocks our development (see #2977 (comment)), I made a PR to update to GHC 9.10.1. Because stackage doesn't yet support GHC 9.10.1, I had to add some explicit dependencies and use `allow-newer-deps` in `stack.yaml`. I think we should merge this not to get blocked by the bug, and later clean up `stack.yaml` when GHC 9.10.1 becomes supported on stackage. --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Cadman <[email protected]>
deca795
to
644d5a2
Compare
as
keyword of Juvix), which requires a workaround.Checklist