Reduced Page speed with AMP Version 2.1 #6182

askmeoffers · 2021-05-07T07:55:05Z

Hi Team,

We see our page speed got reduced by 3 points with the recent update on the AMP plugin.

Previously we were getting 98 scores on https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/, but after the updates, it gives a speed score of 94-96 and sometimes lower than this.

As we noticed this issue, so we did not move the update to the Live server

This difference is quite noticeable.

Speed on Live server with AMP plugin version Version 2.0.11: 98
https://askmeoffers.com/coupon-deal-offer-promo-store/oyorooms-com/

Speed on Dev server after AMP plugin updates: 94-96
https://dev-askmeoffersomsairam.pantheonsite.io/coupon-deal-offer-promo-store/oyorooms-com/

Both the environments are absolutely the same apart from amp plugin updates.

Please let us know if any debug information is required.

Thanks
Team - https://askmeoffers.com/

schlessera · 2021-05-07T09:34:40Z

I can see a difference in the PageSpeed Insights measurements:

However, when I use the local PageSpeed audit, I get the exact same scores for both pages:

My first hunch then would be that this might be a server/network issue of the development machine.

Here's a cleaned-up diff of the <head> only:

2c2
< <html lang="en" amp="" i-amphtml-layout="" i-amphtml-no-boilerplate="" transformed="self;v=1">
---
> <html lang="en" amp="" i-amphtml-layout="" i-amphtml-no-boilerplate="" transformed="self;v=1" i-amphtml-binding>
5a6,8
>     <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,maximum-scale=5.0,user-scalable=no">
>     <link as="script" crossorigin="anonymous" href="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.mjs" rel="modulepreload">
>     <link rel="preconnect" href="https://cdn.ampproject.org">
583d585
<     <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=5.0,user-scalable=no">
597c599
<     <meta name="generator" content="AMP Plugin v2.0.11; mode=standard">
---
>     <meta name="generator" content="AMP Plugin v2.1.0; mode=standard">
599,606c601,610
<     <title>Oyo Coupons Code &amp; Offers, Get 95% Off On Hotels May 2021</title>
<     <link rel="preconnect" href="https://cdn.ampproject.org">
<     <link rel="preload" as="script" href="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.js">
<     <script async="" src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.js"></script>
<     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-bind-0.1.js" async="" custom-element="amp-bind"></script>
<     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-form-0.1.js" async="" custom-element="amp-form"></script>
<     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-list-0.1.js" async="" custom-element="amp-list"></script>
<     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-mustache-0.2.js" async="" custom-template="amp-mustache"></script>
---
>     <script async="" src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.mjs" type="module" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script async nomodule src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.js" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-bind-0.1.mjs" async="" custom-element="amp-bind" type="module" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script async nomodule src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-bind-0.1.js" crossorigin="anonymous" custom-element="amp-bind"></script>
>     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-form-0.1.mjs" async="" custom-element="amp-form" type="module" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script async nomodule src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-form-0.1.js" crossorigin="anonymous" custom-element="amp-form"></script>
>     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-list-0.1.mjs" async="" custom-element="amp-list" type="module" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script async nomodule src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-list-0.1.js" crossorigin="anonymous" custom-element="amp-list"></script>
>     <script src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-mustache-0.2.mjs" async="" custom-template="amp-mustache" type="module" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
>     <script async nomodule src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-mustache-0.2.js" crossorigin="anonymous" custom-template="amp-mustache"></script>
614c618,619
<         amp-img.amp-wp-enforced-sizes[layout="intrinsic"]>img {
---
>         .amp-wp-enforced-sizes {
>             -o-object-fit: contain;
617a623,631
>         amp-img img,
>         amp-img noscript {
>             image-rendering: inherit;
>             -o-object-fit: inherit;
>             object-fit: inherit;
>             -o-object-position: inherit;
>             object-position: inherit
>         }
> 
4596a4611
>     <title>Oyo Coupons Code &amp; Offers, Get 95% Off On Hotels May 2021</title>

askmeoffers · 2021-05-07T10:00:13Z

Hi, @schlessera. Thank you for the quick revert.

Okay I will install an older release of the AMP plugin right away (Version - Version 2.0.11 ) on the development server too
https://dev-askmeoffersomsairam.pantheonsite.io/coupon-deal-offer-promo-store/oyorooms-com/

With the old version, I can see 98 scores same as that of the Live server

Now on the dev server, I have left the old version for your analysis

For almost two years, we are working on this project to improve speed scores as it's directly related to our organic rankings.

And we are 100% sure that this AMP plugin release is causing a reduction in speed score by 2-3 points.

As soon as we are installing the new plugin speed will be reduced by 2-3 points.

schlessera · 2021-05-07T10:14:28Z

Ok, great, I got a much better diff now, as both the content changes and the origin change are gone when comparing dev to dev.

I also get better scores now on pagespeed insights than before, indeed.

As we now ruled out the server/network, can you switch back the dev version to 2.1.0 now so I can run more tests between dev and prod?

askmeoffers · 2021-05-07T10:17:02Z

@schlessera Sure I have done now latest AMP release is active on the DEV server.

Team
https://askmeoffers.com/

schlessera · 2021-05-07T10:26:55Z

What I see from a resource loading perspective is that the v2.1.0 (right) version is equal or faster than the v2.0.11 (left) version:

They load the same number of resources, but 2.1.0 transfers less bytes and finishes the overall load faster.

However, the DOMContentLoaded happens later on v2.1.0 than on v2.0.11. I'd assume for now that the loading is better on v2.1.0, but JS execution or rendering is slower on v2.1.0.

Let's try to drill deeper into that...

schlessera · 2021-05-07T10:30:09Z

Another possible hint - if I throttle the connection to 'Slow 3G`, v2.1.0 is an overall winner:

This makes it all the more likely that is has nothing to do with the actual loading (which seems faster on v2.1.0) but only with how the page and its assets is then assembled/interpreted.

askmeoffers · 2021-05-07T10:47:16Z

Hi, @schlessera Ok, thank you for your hints, but please try to share patch release, which doesn't impact speed scores and those that are too important for organic rankings.

The new release of the AMP plugin might be improving the performance in real but its impacting scores

schlessera · 2021-05-07T11:02:11Z

Going through the profiling runs doesn't show anything conclusive. On most runs, the v2.1.0 is faster in all regards than the v2.0.11 version:

please try to share patch release, which doesn't impact speed scores

Yes, I agree we need to keep the scores up, but I need to figure out first what is actually lowering them. Every single measurements I've done so far has v2.1.0 be faster, so I'm not yet sure what exactly is lowering those scores...

I have a hunch that the ESM support might not be working as expected on the PageSpeed Insights tool, so I'll share a plugin for you to test that switches ESM support of. Give me a few minutes to assemble such a plugin...

schlessera · 2021-05-07T11:03:56Z

@askmeoffers Can you try installing and activating the following plugin on your dev site (with v2.1.0) to see what PSI measures when ESM is off?

https://gist.github.com/schlessera/4127ab30f4235f1acbc11e3eee77701a

schlessera · 2021-05-07T11:05:27Z

With the above plugin you can run v2.1.0 without ESM by appending ?amp_esm=0 to the page URL.

askmeoffers · 2021-05-07T11:07:59Z

@schlessera done I have installed and activated it.

schlessera · 2021-05-07T11:16:10Z

I did a few PSI runs now between these two URLs:

Although 2. is faster in all regards in local tests, it consistently results in lower scores in PSI.

@westonruter, @sebastianbenz, @kristoferbaxter: Could it be that PSI does not yet properly support ES modules? The ESM version seems leaner and faster in all regards on my local system, so why would the performance score be lower?

@askmeoffers As a work-around for now if you want to get v2.1.0 to production, you can add the following code to your site to disable ESM by default for now:

use AmpProject\Optimizer\Transformer\RewriteAmpUrls;
use AmpProject\Optimizer\Configuration\RewriteAmpUrlsConfiguration;

add_filter( 'amp_optimizer_config', static function ( $config ) {
	$config[ RewriteAmpUrls::class ][ RewriteAmpUrlsConfiguration::ESM_MODULES_ENABLED ] = false;
	return $config;
} );

sebastianbenz · 2021-05-07T12:32:54Z

Just ran two WPT tests and they confirm the same:

ESM=0
ESM=1

The ESM version shows increased mainthread activity:

vs

schlessera · 2021-05-07T12:59:30Z

That's quite an obvious increase in runtime, for what is supposed to be less code to execute. Is the ESM version doing something fundamentally different that requires more processing, or does this point to a potential bug?

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-07T14:15:18Z

On mobile so can't dig deep right now, but are we sure the execution of JS is at play here?

From quick glance at the WPT data it appears to be main thread time outside of JS (since the execution is before JS is streamed and executed).

Also, what does real user data say?

schlessera · 2021-05-07T14:30:59Z

From quick glance at the WPT data it appears to be main thread time outside of JS (since the execution is before JS is streamed and executed).

Could this extra processing be caused by modulepreload, perhaps? Assuming that some JS has to be executed for figuring out the graph to download, I could see this appearing as the main browser thread work here...

Also, what does real user data say?

This is a dev site atm, since the site owner does not want to push a change to prod that reduces the performance score.

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-07T16:37:41Z

This is a dev site atm, since the site owner does not want to push a change to prod that reduces the performance score.

The synthetic scores are not the source of truth for end user performance, but valuable for comparing versions. My hunch is the end user metrics are actually improved with module scripts (as seen across the Google AMP Cache).

Could this extra processing be caused by modulepreload, perhaps? Assuming that some JS has to be executed for figuring out the graph to download, I could see this appearing as the main browser thread work here...

Good theory! I'll try to create a example of this document to test some ideas today using Cloudflare Workers.

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-10T13:55:53Z

I don't seem to have access to the site using the newest version (https://dev-askmeoffersomsairam.pantheonsite.io/coupon-deal-offer-promo-store/oyorooms-com/?amp_esm=1)

Can someone grant me access?

askmeoffers · 2021-05-10T14:07:48Z

@kristoferbaxter Thank you for your prompt.
I have removed protection for the dev server.

Team
https://askmeoffers.com/

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-10T14:20:24Z

Thanks! Taking a look.

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-10T14:28:30Z

Leaving notes here as I run thru the site.

Is there a reason for the viewport meta tag changes? <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,maximum-scale=5.0,user-scalable=no"> instead of <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">.
I'm assuming the server response time is a byproduct of this being a dev server? 106.75ms is a little long.
https://i1.wp.com/askmeoffers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/oyo-coupon-codes.jpg?resize=200%2C80&ssl=1 appears to be a hero image, can it be marked with data-hero?

Also: this appears to be a quite fast site (especially for being a dev server) as it passes CWV metrics in lab testing.

Next: investigating the module specific changes.

schlessera · 2021-05-10T14:57:43Z

Is there a reason for the viewport meta tag changes? instead of .

The WP plugin already removes the initial-scale=1 bit, in an attempt to get to the required viewport to reduce FID. However, it doesn't yet take into account other attributes. This is planned to be improved upon via a special Optimizer transformer with ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#126

https://i1.wp.com/askmeoffers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/oyo-coupon-codes.jpg?resize=200%2C80&ssl=1 appears to be a hero image, can it be marked with data-hero?

I'll do some investigation to see why the WP plugin's DetermineHeroImages transformer did not pick that image up for a hero image candidate...

westonruter · 2021-05-10T22:06:28Z

https://i1.wp.com/askmeoffers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/oyo-coupon-codes.jpg?resize=200%2C80&ssl=1 appears to be a hero image, can it be marked with data-hero?

I'll do some investigation to see why the WP plugin's DetermineHeroImages transformer did not pick that image up for a hero image candidate...

The key reason is that the image is “tiny” at being only 80 pixels high. The other reason is that the image doesn't appear to be a featured image output via the_post_thumbnail(), so the HeroCandidateFiltering service is not marking it with data-hero-candidate.

@askmeoffers I recommend you add the data-hero-candidate to this image to force it to be included among the hero image candidates.

askmeoffers · 2021-05-11T04:06:50Z

@westonruter, we have added "data-hero-candidate" to the image tag to enforce making it a hero image.

@kristoferbaxter we have also changed the meta to suggested

But we still see a speed score difference when comparing below over PSI.

Thank You
Team - https://askmeoffers.com/

askmeoffers · 2021-05-13T08:34:18Z

We have turned ON the security mode for the dev site as we see too many attacks on dev sites and other security attacks. Still, whenever required to debug and analyze, please contact us ([email protected]) or update us on this ticket. We will remove it.

kristoferbaxter · 2021-05-13T13:03:19Z

We're discussing the issue with the V8 team and have pulled a local copy to further debug.

Will update as we learn more.

westonruter · 2021-06-11T23:53:13Z

Could this extra processing be caused by modulepreload, perhaps? Assuming that some JS has to be executed for figuring out the graph to download, I could see this appearing as the main browser thread work here...

I'm seeing this as well.

I also went further by moving other AMP scripts down to either right before the respective component (e.g. amp-carousel) or to the very end of the body for components which are not render-critical (e.g. amp-analytics and amp-lightbox). Here are my findings: https://amp-script-placement-experimentation.glitch.me/

In short, for an SSR'ed page, these changes can shave 294ms from a needs-improvement LCP of 2.586s LCP, taking it down 11% to a good LCP of 2.292s.

kristoferbaxter · 2021-06-12T02:24:54Z

The example cases used were a comparison of module parsing versus classic script parsing for the same content without preloading.

However, let's meet next week to discuss your findings and see if we can replicate across a larger swath of the corpus. If so, we should move to your suggestion!

cc @erwinmombay and @jridgewell

westonruter · 2021-06-21T21:40:41Z

@kristoferbaxter @erwinmombay @jridgewell I've put together a prototype Optimizer transformer which moves all non-render critical scripts to the end of the body, in addition to removing the modulepreload link: https://gist.github.com/westonruter/e45cd802a75c7deb80a2a1639b4cea7c

I've deployed this on three sites behind a feature flag. To try it, add the amp_postpone_script_loading query parameter.

The following WPT results are for testing Moto G4 - Chrome - 3G with 3 runs:

Site	Without Optimization	With Optimization	Diff
blog.amp.dev	FCP:1.826s, LCP:2.094s, CLS:0, TBT:0.023s (URL, WPT)	FCP:2.078s, LCP:2.077s, CLS:0, TBT:0.017s (URL, WPT)	FCP:+0.252s, LCP:-0.017s, TBT:+0.006s
amp-wp.org	FCP:2.205s, LCP:2.238s, CLS:0.002, TBT:0.137s (URL, WPT)	FCP:1.979s, LCP:2.113s, CLS:0.002, TBT:0.152s (URL, WPT)	FCP:-0.226s, LCP:-0.125s, TBD:+0.015s
weston.ruter.net	FCP:1.955s, LCP:2.104s, CLS:0.011, TBT:0.075s (URL, WPT)	FCP:1.806s, LCP:1.943s, CLS:0.011, TBT: 0.076s (URL, WPT)	FCP:-0.149s, LCP:-0.161s, TBT:+0.001s

Update: For implementation in amp-optimizer-php, see ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#327.

erwinmombay · 2021-06-21T21:49:15Z

cc @rcebulko as well for the latest post

erwinmombay · 2021-06-21T22:11:29Z

@westonruter had a question, how do you get the Chrome Field Performance ? not sure what option you turn on for the feature on WPT

rcebulko · 2021-06-21T22:18:46Z

@westonruter Is it possible to get WPT to run more iterations of these trials? From what I can tell, the FCP and LCP fluctuations are within one standard deviation of the mean for each, so it's not clear how much is signal vs. noise so far

westonruter · 2021-06-21T22:30:51Z

how do you get the Chrome Field Performance ? not sure what option you turn on for the feature on WPT

@erwinmombay I'm not sure. I don't know most of the configuration settings for WPT. I just ran it with the following:

Is it possible to get WPT to run more iterations of these trials? From what I can tell, the FCP and LCP fluctuations are within one standard deviation of the mean for each, so it's not clear how much is signal vs. noise so far

@rcebulko The URLs for testing yourself are all linked in the table.

The results I believe will be much more telling when there are more AMP scripts on the page. I'm going to try to get another site running this which has many more.

askmeoffers · 2021-06-23T06:02:12Z

@westonruter Is there any way to merge this prototype in the AMP plugin and for our site and test it?

westonruter · 2021-06-23T06:06:07Z

@askmeoffers the prototype is a plugin which you install alongside the AMP plugin: https://gist.github.com/westonruter/e45cd802a75c7deb80a2a1639b4cea7c

askmeoffers · 2021-06-23T06:09:09Z

@westonruter, wow, thank you! I am going to deploy it right away also now, with the above-prototyped plugin, can i remove the below lines recommended by @schlessera

use AmpProject\Optimizer\Transformer\RewriteAmpUrls;
use AmpProject\Optimizer\Configuration\RewriteAmpUrlsConfiguration;

add_filter( 'amp_optimizer_config', static function ( $config ) {
$config[ RewriteAmpUrls::class ][ RewriteAmpUrlsConfiguration::ESM_MODULES_ENABLED ] = false;
return $config;
} );

westonruter · 2021-06-23T06:27:02Z

I would recommend removing that code to re-enable ESM modules, yes. Do note that my plugin is a proof of concept that is requires a query parameter to be supplied (?amp_postpone_script_loading) as a feature flag. So normal visitors won't see the changes.

askmeoffers · 2021-06-23T06:41:31Z

Hi, @westonruter. Thank you, I ran a couple of test iterations (10+ times )on our dev server. The speed score on the google page speed has improved with the query parameter ?amp_postpone_script_loading compared to the previous. Also, there is more stability in speed score than fluctuating results previously.

How can we deploy it to a live server so that we do not need to pass any query parameter if this change release takes time?

westonruter · 2021-06-24T00:02:40Z

@askmeoffers can you please share URLs so we can compare before/after? It's not yet suitable to remove the feature flag because the AMP validator does not yet allow scripts in the body and so your pages would not be valid AMP.

askmeoffers · 2021-06-24T04:03:21Z

@westonruter Thank you! I have removed security protection from the dev server.

Before URL: https://dev-askmeoffersomsairam.pantheonsite.io/

After URL: https://dev-askmeoffersomsairam.pantheonsite.io/?amp_postpone_script_loading

Due to some recent chrome updates, our page speed is fluctuating a lot without this prototype. The CUX report immediately impacts our organic rankings, so I will request you to please release these changes sooner if possible.

Thank You
https://askmeoffers.com/

westonruter · 2021-06-24T04:54:22Z

Thank you.

For this page, the changes introduced with the proposed optimization are:

Removal of link[rel=modulepreload].
Moving amp-autocomplete and amp-bind scripts to the end of the body.

Since there aren't many AMP scripts, the impact is minimal but it does seem to be a win for LCP.

PageSpeed Insights

The changes result in a 3 point bump to the PSI score, 95 to 98. It also reduces the FCP from 2 seconds to 1 second, and brings LCP from 2.5s to 2.3s:

Before	After

WebPageTest

The following results are from 9 runs respectively (with WPT links in table headings):

Metric	Before	After	Diff
Speed Index	3.885s	3.932s	+47ms
FCP	1.834s	1.795s	-39ms
LCP	1.833s	1.795s	-38ms
TBT	0s	0.021s	+21ms

westonruter · 2021-06-26T02:14:27Z

Could this extra processing be caused by modulepreload, perhaps? Assuming that some JS has to be executed for figuring out the graph to download, I could see this appearing as the main browser thread work here...

I've opened a PR to remove modulepreload: ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#261.

I intend this to be included in v2.1.3 next week.

The changes to moving non-critical scripts to the end of the body will have to wait for validator changes.

westonruter · 2021-07-01T18:17:06Z

@askmeoffers AMP plugin v2.1.3 was just released, including the removal of modulepreload as well as other enhancements to the Optimizer (e.g. prerendering more hero images) which should reduce LCP.

askmeoffers · 2021-07-02T04:42:03Z

@westonruter Thank you! we will test it and update here soon.

westonruter · 2021-08-16T19:17:18Z

@askmeoffers Do you have any findings?

askmeoffers · 2021-08-17T22:54:59Z

@westonruter Sorry for the delayed response due to COVID-19 issues within our family members.

The updates improved the speed but we still see the difference in speed with ESM_MODULES disabled/enabled.

When we disable ESM_MODULES Speed is +3 approximately as we noticed earlier.

We also tested with the default WordPress theme and other hosting providers( wpengine, pantheon, and flywheel servers) and found that the speed is 100 on PSI when we disable ESM_MODULES but if we enable it then there is a slight impact (reduction by 3 to 4 points).

I will share the URL by this week with our reports.

Thank You

askmeoffers · 2021-08-23T06:41:13Z

Hi Team,

Below are URL's

With Enabled ESM Module :
https://dev-askmeoffers-global.pantheonsite.io/oyo-coupons/

With Disabled ESM Module
https://askmeoffers.com/oyo-coupons/

Thanks
Team

westonruter · 2021-08-23T19:58:34Z

Comparing the live environment with the dev environment may not give the most reliable results, as the dev environment has caching turned off. I recommend deploying a plugin to the live env that allows you to conditionally turn on/off ESM modules so that you can test more accurately.

Here's an example of such a plugin: https://gist.github.com/westonruter/279bcb54336449ce55d8887fb0fcf5b9

It disables ESM modules by default, except of the amp_esm_enabled query parameter is present.

askmeoffers · 2021-08-24T06:15:51Z

@westonruter Thank you!

I have activated the plugin on the live server
https://askmeoffers.com/oyo-coupons/

You can continue debugging

Thanks
Team-

westonruter · 2021-08-24T22:57:31Z

I ran the two versions through 9 runs each on WebPageTest. The results are showing a performance improvement with ESM enabled:

Variation	Performance results
ESM Disabled
ESM Enabled

WebPageTest was configured as follows:

askmeoffers · 2021-08-25T04:58:16Z

@westonruter Thank you!

I also notice the same from my end

The speed has improved with ESM Mode enabled in a live environment.

Earlier we compared the dev environment so that caused confusion

Thanks to the AMP team who have enabled us with such a powerful web framework!

I will deactivate the plugin now so that ESM mode is enabled and we can close this ticket now.

askmeoffers added the Bug Something isn't working label May 7, 2021

westonruter added the Performance label May 7, 2021

westonruter mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2021

AutoExtensionImporter: Append extension scripts after runtime script ampproject/amp-toolbox#1241

Merged

westonruter mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2021

Remove preload for AMP runtime again when boilerplate was removed ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#17

Closed

westonruter mentioned this issue Jun 26, 2021

Disable AMP runtime preloading by default ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#261

Merged

westonruter closed this as completed Aug 25, 2021

schlessera mentioned this issue Aug 25, 2021

Investigate moving some extension scripts to the end of <body> ampproject/amp-toolbox-php#327

Open

Reduced Page speed with AMP Version 2.1 #6182

Reduced Page speed with AMP Version 2.1 #6182

Comments

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

sebastianbenz commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021 • edited Loading

kristoferbaxter commented May 7, 2021

schlessera commented May 7, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented May 7, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented May 10, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 10, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented May 10, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented May 10, 2021

schlessera commented May 10, 2021

westonruter commented May 10, 2021 • edited Loading

askmeoffers commented May 11, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 13, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented May 13, 2021

westonruter commented Jun 11, 2021

kristoferbaxter commented Jun 12, 2021 • edited Loading

westonruter commented Jun 21, 2021 • edited Loading

erwinmombay commented Jun 21, 2021

erwinmombay commented Jun 21, 2021

rcebulko commented Jun 21, 2021

westonruter commented Jun 21, 2021

askmeoffers commented Jun 23, 2021

westonruter commented Jun 23, 2021

askmeoffers commented Jun 23, 2021

westonruter commented Jun 23, 2021

askmeoffers commented Jun 23, 2021

westonruter commented Jun 24, 2021

askmeoffers commented Jun 24, 2021 • edited Loading

westonruter commented Jun 24, 2021 • edited Loading

PageSpeed Insights

WebPageTest

westonruter commented Jun 26, 2021

westonruter commented Jul 1, 2021

askmeoffers commented Jul 2, 2021

westonruter commented Aug 16, 2021

askmeoffers commented Aug 17, 2021

askmeoffers commented Aug 23, 2021

westonruter commented Aug 23, 2021

askmeoffers commented Aug 24, 2021

westonruter commented Aug 24, 2021

askmeoffers commented Aug 25, 2021

askmeoffers commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

schlessera commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

schlessera commented May 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading

westonruter commented May 10, 2021 •

edited

Loading

kristoferbaxter commented Jun 12, 2021 •

edited

Loading

westonruter commented Jun 21, 2021 •

edited

Loading

askmeoffers commented Jun 24, 2021 •

edited

Loading

westonruter commented Jun 24, 2021 •

edited

Loading