Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Allow full rdp connection without mesh and url actions tweaks #2026

Open
P6g9YHK6 opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@P6g9YHK6
Copy link

P6g9YHK6 commented Oct 8, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
currently mesh has some issues that the standard windows rdp does not have like drag and drop, easy copy and paste, auth passthrough etc etc

Describe the solution you'd like
A drop down menu when doing a "take control" allowing at least the first 2 options
1 Mesh
2 RDP DL
3 RDP Link (to be used in conjoncture with Mstsc launcher (could be a default custom also)
4 customs url action

"ms-rd" is dog-shit
i would propose to use something like Eset's solution for RDP as there is not really anything else viable natively
the "rdp" link would make the client download a .rdp file each time that contains the local ip of the default interface of the device and i think it is a viable solution short term (see screenshots below).
The tech's browser could then be configured to auto-open .rdp files and make the process transparent for the tech.

Url action could be divided into 2 categories "normal" and "take control" that would send them to either the normal menu or the take control one

Describe alternatives you've considered
let's just say that url actions is getting pretty full and some other solutions natively supported would be nice to keep stuff organised
and this would provide a good start of a replacement solution for https://mremoteng.org/

Additional context
image
image

image
image

image

@P6g9YHK6
Copy link
Author

linking #213

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant