You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the hierarchy is displayed in no particular order, which is not optimal for the end user. I'm not sure if I found all the right places, but following patch seems to work:
diff --git a/src/main/java/com/enterprisepasswordsafe/database/HierarchyNodeDAO.java b/src/main/java/com/enterprisepasswordsafe/database/HierarchyNodeDAO.java
index ce055ed..fa18514 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/enterprisepasswordsafe/database/HierarchyNodeDAO.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/enterprisepasswordsafe/database/HierarchyNodeDAO.java
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
*/
private static final String GET_NODE_BY_NAME_SQL =
- "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE name = ?";
+ "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE name = ? ORDER BY name";
/**
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
*/
private static final String GET_ALL_CHILDREN_NODES_SQL =
- "SELECT node_id, name, parent_id, type FROM hierarchy nodes WHERE parent_id = ? ";
+ "SELECT node_id, name, parent_id, type FROM hierarchy nodes WHERE parent_id = ? ORDER BY name ";
/**
* The SQL statement to get the nodes representing a specific access controlled object.
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
private static final String GET_VALID_CHILD_OBJECT_IDS_VIA_UAC_SQL =
"SELECT h.name FROM hierarchy h, user_access_control uac "
+ " WHERE h.parent_id = ? AND h.type = " + HierarchyNode.OBJECT_NODE + " AND uac.item_id = h.name "
- + " AND uac.rkey is not null AND uac.user_id = ? ";
+ + " AND uac.rkey is not null AND uac.user_id = ? ORDER BY h.name ";
/**
* The SQL statement to get the valid object node children for a given
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
+ " FROM hierarchy h, group_access_control gac, membership m, groups g "
+ " WHERE h.parent_id = ? AND h.type = "+ HierarchyNode.OBJECT_NODE+ " AND gac.item_id = h.name "
+ " AND gac.rkey is not null AND m.group_id = gac.group_id AND m.user_id = ? "
- + " AND g.group_id = gac.group_id AND g.status = " + Group.STATUS_ENABLED;
+ + " AND g.group_id = gac.group_id AND g.status = " + Group.STATUS_ENABLED + " ORDER BY h.name";
/**
* The SQL statement to get the all child object node ids.
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
*/
private static final String GET_CHILD_CONTAINER_NODES_SQL =
- "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE parent_id = ? AND type=" + HierarchyNode.CONTAINER_NODE;
+ "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE parent_id = ? AND type=" + HierarchyNode.CONTAINER_NODE + " ORDER BY name";
/**
* The SQL statement to get the child container nodes of a specific node.
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
private static final String GET_USER_CONTAINER_NODE_SQL =
"SELECT node_id, name, parent_id, type FROM hierarchy WHERE name = ? "
- + " AND type = " + HierarchyNode.USER_CONTAINER_NODE;
+ + " AND type = " + HierarchyNode.USER_CONTAINER_NODE + " ORDER BY name";
/**
* The SQL statement to get the child container nodes of a specific node.
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ public final class HierarchyNodeDAO
*/
private static final String TEST_NODES_REFERRING_TO_OBJECT_NODE_SQL =
- "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE name = ? AND type = " + HierarchyNode.OBJECT_NODE;
+ "SELECT " + NODE_FIELDS + " FROM hierarchy WHERE name = ? AND type = " + HierarchyNode.OBJECT_NODE + " ORDER BY name";
/**
* The SQL to delete a node.
A similar ordering would be nice for the passwords as well.
Well, I'm not really a coder, so I'm not sure if this makes sense. It seems to work, but I also see error messages like
24-Aug-2020 21:41:01.374 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-5] com.enterprisepasswordsafe.database.StoredObjectFetcher.getMultiple Error fetching object.
java.sql.SQLDataException: No such column: 3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
please ignore the exception mentioned above, this is probably due to my old dataset and incomplete migration. The password_data column is always empty, therefore
Currently, the hierarchy is displayed in no particular order, which is not optimal for the end user. I'm not sure if I found all the right places, but following patch seems to work:
A similar ordering would be nice for the passwords as well.
Well, I'm not really a coder, so I'm not sure if this makes sense. It seems to work, but I also see error messages like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: