Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GeSpectrum Data vs MC: A Few Questions #40

Open
AndrewEdmonds11 opened this issue Sep 29, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

GeSpectrum Data vs MC: A Few Questions #40

AndrewEdmonds11 opened this issue Sep 29, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@AndrewEdmonds11
Copy link

So I have a plot of data (blue) vs MC (black) for all photons (i.e. no time bins):
gespectrum_datavsmc_all

Obviously, the main difference is that there is a large hump in the data and a massive peak below 10 keV. Where does this hump come from? Is it just in the detector response or is it from backgrounds that aren't simulated in the MC?

Currently, my plan is to just plot above 10 keV since these photons aren't important and to find a way to subtract the hump. Is it OK to just do a fit to the hump and subtract it?

Also, John do you have the number of muons that the data corresponds to from the muSc counter? Is this the 3.9e8 that you show in elog:187?

@jrquirk
Copy link

jrquirk commented Sep 29, 2014

The bump shows up in beam off. I think it's background. The peak at ~zero energies I imagine is a mixture of electronic noise and regular xray background, but honestly I haven't thought about it.

The number of muons is what you say, as this is the entirety of the Al50b dataset.

And for fitting the hump, I just used TSpectrum::Background. It gives a nice smooth BG spectrum. You might want to use more than the default 20 passes to get rid of some of some of the peaks in the BG. The shape I'm not sure what it is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants