You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The script works nicely except it seems to hit a rate limit quite quickly and you have to wait a while to try the script again, so it involves quite a bit of manual labour to deal with thousands of likes.
I brought the current version into Claude and asked it to create a 90 second pause every 100 posts unliked, in order to slow it down somewhat to try and avoid the rate limit. So far, it seems to be working:
I thought I'd share it here and maybe the dev can human-sense check it and make it even better/more reliable?
Such as defining the best number of posts to process before the auto-pause, as well as the amount of time to auto-pause/wait, if there is such a number, or making it selectable, in order to avoid the rate limit.
It also doesn't seem that the script tries to do anything differently when the 429 error happens, so in addition or alternatively, the script could change its response/actions when the 429 error shows up? (If possible)
The script works nicely except it seems to hit a rate limit quite quickly and you have to wait a while to try the script again, so it involves quite a bit of manual labour to deal with thousands of likes.
I brought the current version into Claude and asked it to create a 90 second pause every 100 posts unliked, in order to slow it down somewhat to try and avoid the rate limit. So far, it seems to be working:
I thought I'd share it here and maybe the dev can human-sense check it and make it even better/more reliable?
Such as defining the best number of posts to process before the auto-pause, as well as the amount of time to auto-pause/wait, if there is such a number, or making it selectable, in order to avoid the rate limit.
It also doesn't seem that the script tries to do anything differently when the 429 error happens, so in addition or alternatively, the script could change its response/actions when the 429 error shows up? (If possible)
Here's the code with my batching auto-pause:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: