You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
This is like an update of the situation with orefs.py. I now it's deprecate, but it's an amazing tool, it would be really pity to give up, because we have nothing else...
Orefs, is almost perfect!
If I respect all the "rules", names without period, SEPM for different reference of a same book different from SEPP. It works very well. Only for the this type of ref:
Yo can see 42:1-5 is not processed. But if I have 42:1 it will be good processed. During the process orefs.py see this reference as a Gen 42:1-5 saying it was not processed!!!
I use an old version of orefs.py because the new is not working.
Solving this problem would improve a lot orefs.py.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Orefs doesn't work properly the way it's currently written. That's why I stopped updating it. In many cases, the osisRefs that it generates are invalid, even though the XML validation says they're okay. One of these days, eventually, I will get around to trying to rewrite it. I have to figure out how to split the references apart without badly mangling things so that proper OSIS references can be created first. It's not an easy task for me.
Hello,
This is like an update of the situation with orefs.py. I now it's deprecate, but it's an amazing tool, it would be really pity to give up, because we have nothing else...
Orefs, is almost perfect!
If I respect all the "rules", names without period, SEPM for different reference of a same book different from SEPP. It works very well. Only for the this type of ref:
Yo can see 42:1-5 is not processed. But if I have 42:1 it will be good processed. During the process orefs.py see this reference as a Gen 42:1-5 saying it was not processed!!!
I use an old version of orefs.py because the new is not working.
Solving this problem would improve a lot orefs.py.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: