##xAPI CoP Charter Template
[DOMAIN AREA] COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
Version [x.x]
[date]
VERSION HISTORY
Version # | ImplementedBy | RevisionDate | ApprovedBy | ApprovalDate | Reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | Initial community charter draft | ||||
##TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
- 4.1 Mission)
- 4.2 Goals
- 4.3 Activities & Deliverables
- 4.4 Leaders/conveners
- 4.5 Steering Committee
- 4.6 Membership
-
- 5.1 Assumptions
- 5.2 Constraints
- 5.3 Risks
The [Domain Area] Community of Practice (CoP) charter documents information required by decision makers to approve and support the activities necessary for a successful launch, cultivation, and sustainability of the Community of Practice. The CoP charter includes the needs, scope, justification, and resource commitments.
The intended audience of the [Domain Area] Community of Practice community charter is the community sponsors, senior leadership, and the community members.
###2. CoP OverviewA CoP is a group of people connected by a common cause, role or purpose, which operates in a common modality. CoPS are a way of developing new knowledge, stimulating innovation, and sharing knowledge. Communities of practice knit people together with peers and their outputs can include leading practices, guidelines, knowledge repositories, technical problem and solution discussions, and strategies. Each xAPI CoP represents a group of professionals, informally bound to one another through a common classification of xAPI vocabulary requirements and common pursuit of solutions to satisfy those requirements.
[Your overview should explain the reason for the community to exist. Consider
- What is the long-term and short-term value of the CoP to community members? The larger xAPI community?
- What learning opportunities will members have after joining?
- How will this greater knowledge enhance the domain area?]
The xAPI specification was written to be flexible enough to meet the varying use cases of the eLearning community. This flexibility can lead to a degradation of interoperability if CoPs do not agree to certain conventions. These conventions and rules on how to use the xAPI can be decided upon by each CoP and applied to the base xAPI specification as profiles.
The xAPI CoPS will generate a controlled vocabulary lists and design profiles. Some xAPI CoPS may also leverage the work from external CoPs, depending upon the domain area.
## 4. Scope ### 4.1 Mission[Your mission should concisely explain the purpose of the xAPI CoP. It should be the basis of decisions made by your group. Consider
- Why should this xAPI CoP exist?
- What are the problems/issues/goals that the group may address?
- What will members achieve by joining this xAPI CoP?
The goals of the [Domain Area] Community of Practice are as follows: [tweak all goals as necessary for your CoP]
- Develop a [Domain Area] CoP Profile for xAPI
- Look for collaboration points with CoPs outside of [Domain Area]
- Develop and support [Domain Area] best practices for xAPI
- Develop [Domain Area] xAPI Controlled Vocabulary
- Develop [Domain Area] Design Profiles
- [additional goals]
ACTIVITY LIST | START | FINISH | |
---|---|---|---|
1.1 | Establish Community and Register with ADL xAPI Directory | ||
1.2 | Complete Community of Practice Charter | ||
1.3 | Utilize Online Collaboration Tools: Calendar, google groups, webinars, etc. | ||
1.4 | Participate in joint meetings | ||
1.5 | Generate controlled vocabulary and design profile(s) | ||
1.6 | Provide CoP updates to ADL xAPI CoP | ||
1.7 | Regular evaluations of CoP vocabulary |
- [Leaders/conveners will be responsible for leading the meetings and establishing an agenda and objectives for the CoP. The leaders/conveners will be decided by the steering committee. It is recommended that at lest two leaders are chosen for each CoP so that there is a backup person in case one can no longer participate or is absent. List the leaders' names here.]
- [The steering committee will be appointed at the initial meeting of the CoP. The steering committee will have the following positions: meeting leader/convener, a technical lead, a documentation lead, and a communications lead. List the names below or insert a link to the Steering Committee page.]
-
Operate around the following governance principles: participation, transparency, responsiveness, consensus orientation, equity and inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, accountability, and rules of engagement
-
Be open to all with an interest and who abide by community norms
-
Encourage the ongoing education of members and the deepening of expertise among members
-
Members strive to create an environment of trust and to foster insightful, non-threatening discussion of ideas and experiences
-
Members distribute leadership responsibilities and collectively share in the management of the community
-
Membership and topics reflect [Domain Area] xAPI CoP and organizations
-
Members agree to be respectful and use appropriate language in group discussions and to listen and respond to each other with open and constructive minds
-
Members will not be afraid to respectfully challenge one another by asking questions, but refrain from personal attacks -- focus on ideas
-
Members will participate to the fullest extent possible -- community growth depends on the inclusion of every individual voice
-
Members commit to search for opportunities for consensus or compromise and for creative solutions
-
Members will contribute to an atmosphere of problem solving rather than stating positions
-
Members will attempt to build on each member's strengths, and help each other improve areas in need of further development
-
[additional rule]
The following assumptions were taken into consideration in the development of this community. If any of these assumptions prove to be invalid then the community could face a possible risk.
- There is an interest among [Domain Area] in forming a xAPI CoP.
- There will be CoP members who take increasing responsibility for stewarding the success of the community.
- ADL will support the time investment for their staff to participate in the community.
- [additional assumption]
The following constraints were taken into consideration in the development of this community.
- The availability of members to participate collectively at a single unique time may limit the number of participants.
- [additional constraint]
- [additional constraint]
The table below lists the risks for this community, along with a proposed mitigation strategy.
Risk | Mitigation |
---|---|
Community does not establish leadership or steering committee | [mitigation] |
Community does not draw interest | [mitigation] |
[additional risk] | [mitigation] |
This section describes the key roles supporting the community.
Name or Organization | CoP Role | Community Responsibilities |
---|---|---|
Community Member | Person who attends the xAPI CoP meetings and activity contributes toward achieving its goals. | |
ADL (Persons TBD) | Community Sponsor | Person or Persons responsible for acting as the community's champion and providing resources, direction and support to the team. |
Community Leader/Convener | Person or persons who runs the sets the agenda and facilitates the meetings. The leader/convener has specific accountability for managing the community within the approved constraints of scope and time to deliver the specified requirements and deliverables. | |
Documentation Lead | Person responsible capturing meeting minutes and documenting the final xAPI controlled vocabulary, design profiles, and other written work required of the CoP. | |
Communications Lead | Person responsible for establishing mechanisms for communicating with the CoP. This will include coordinating any forms of messaging or collaboration using tools or forums. | |
Technical Lead | Person responsible for providing technical expertise in regards to data formats, web technologies, and programming. |
A stakeholder is a person or organization – such as sponsors and the public – that is involved in the community, and/or that could positively or negatively impact the achievement of the community's objectives, and/or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected by the execution or completion of the community. The table below shows the stakeholders currently identified.
STAKEHOLDER | REPRESENTATIVE(s) |
---|---|
The undersigned acknowledge they have reviewed the community charter and agree to launch the [Domain Area] Community of Practice. Changes to this community charter will be coordinated with and approved by the undersigned or their designated representatives.
Signature: | Date: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Print Name: | |||
Title: | |||
Role: |
Signature: | Date: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Print Name: | |||
Title: | |||
Role: |
Signature: | Date: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Print Name: | |||
Title: | |||
Role: |