Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update .gitignore #3979

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

paulgessinger
Copy link
Member

@paulgessinger paulgessinger commented Dec 11, 2024

  • Un-ignore the .github folder
  • Restrict the build exclude pattern to the repository root.

--- END COMMIT MESSAGE ---

Any further description goes here, @-mentions are ok here!

  • Use a conventional commits prefix: quick summary
    • We mostly use feat, fix, refactor, docs, chore and build types.
  • A milestone will be assigned by one of the maintainers

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the .gitignore file to enhance tracking and organization of ignored files and directories.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

Significant modifications, the .gitignore file has seen. New patterns added, existing ones altered. Temporary Athena files, build directories, and various output types now ignored. Hidden files, all included, exceptions for config files maintained. The .github directory’s handling changed, tracking of contents allowed. Structure reorganized, clarity through comments added.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Major updates with new patterns for temporary files, build directories, and output file types. Adjustments to hidden files and .github directory handling, along with improved organization and comments.

Possibly related PRs

  • ci: Lint updates #3958: Changes in the .gitignore file may relate to the overall CI process and linting updates, as both PRs involve configuration files that affect project management and file handling within the repository.

In the code's embrace, changes unfold,
Patterns anew, like stories retold.
Hidden files dance, exceptions in sight,
A .github directory, now tracked in the light.
Clarity reigns, with comments so clear,
A Jedi's wisdom, in code we hold dear. 🌌


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 595f2e6 and 1c21658.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .gitignore (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.gitignore (2)

Line range hint 33-37: Strong with the Force, this change is!

Un-ignored the .github directory now is, allowing important GitHub workflows and configurations to be tracked, hmmmm. Consistent with other configuration files like .clang-format and .gitlab-ci.yml, this pattern now is.

Verify the contents of .github directory, we shall:

✅ Verification successful

Verified, the .github directory contents are, hmmmm!

A well-structured GitHub configuration repository this is, yes! Contains it does:

  • Essential workflow files for CI/CD, it has (workflows/)
  • Security updates through Dependabot (dependabot.yml)
  • Templates for issues and pull requests, properly configured
  • Automated labeling (labeler.yml) and work-in-progress handling (wip.yml)

Strong with automation, this repository is! Wise decision it was, to un-ignore the .github directory. Properly tracked, these important configurations now will be.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# If .github directory exists, inspect its contents we must
if [ -d ".github" ]; then
    echo "Contents of .github directory, these are:"
    ls -la .github/
    
    echo "Workflow files, if they exist:"
    fd -t f . .github/workflows/
fi

Length of output: 1220


18-18: Hmmmm, wise change this is, young Padawan!

Root-level build directories only, now ignored they are. Prevent accidental ignoring of nested build directories in subdirectories, this change does.

Verify the impact of this change, we must:

✅ Verification successful

Wise and correct, the change to build directory pattern is!

Examined the codebase thoroughly, I have. The change to /build* pattern, safe it is. The following truths, revealed they were:

  • In docs/getting_started.md, build directory always at root level recommended it is, with cmake -B <build> -S <source> pattern.
  • In CI workflows, build directory at root level used consistently it is.
  • No nested build directories in subdirectories required they are, except docs/_build which separately configured it is.
  • Documentation build system, its own separate configuration it has, affected by this change it is not.

The Force tells me this change aligns with project's build practices and documentation guidelines, it does.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for build directories in subdirectories, we shall
fd -H build -t d | grep -v "^build"

# Check if any important build directories in subdirectories exist, we must
fd -H "CMakeLists.txt" -x dirname {} | grep "/build"

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any nested build directories in source files, we shall
rg -g '!.git' -l "build/" --type-not gitignore

# Check for build-related patterns in package files and configs, we must
fd -H -e json -e yaml -e yml -e xml | xargs rg -l "build/"

# Look for build references in documentation, hmmmm
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -l "build/"

Length of output: 357


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the content of these files for build directory references, we must
cat docs/getting_started.md docs/CMakeLists.txt

# CI/CD pipeline configurations, inspect we shall
cat .github/workflows/builds.yml .github/workflows/docs.yml

Length of output: 45634


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next milestone Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

📊: Physics performance monitoring for 1c21658

Full contents

physmon summary

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 72fc7cb into acts-project:main Dec 11, 2024
46 checks passed
@acts-project-service
Copy link
Collaborator

🔴 Athena integration test results [72fc7cb]

Build job with this PR failed!

Please investigate the build job for the pipeline!

@acts-project-service acts-project-service added the Breaks Athena build This PR breaks the Athena build label Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Breaks Athena build This PR breaks the Athena build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants