You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The runtime attribute is redundant - should it be removed?
The template attribute seems to causes an error when using certain cicero commands (e.g. cicero archive), when it is set to contract - but the cicero commands seem to works fine when set to it is set to clause. It's probably still doing some sort of validation against the Ergo logic syntax - maybe?
Possible Solution
Remove the template and runtime attributes completely - unless there is some benefit to keeping them for future use.
Context (Environment)
cicero v0.24.0
node v19.9.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug Report 🐛
The
package.json
contains some legacy artefacts which need to be removed or rethought.Current Behaviour
An Accord Project template archive contains a
package.json
file containing the following definition:The
runtime
attribute is redundant - should it be removed?The
template
attribute seems to causes an error when using certaincicero
commands (e.g.cicero archive
), when it is set tocontract
- but thecicero
commands seem to works fine when set to it is set toclause
. It's probably still doing some sort of validation against the Ergo logic syntax - maybe?Possible Solution
template
andruntime
attributes completely - unless there is some benefit to keeping them for future use.Context (Environment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: