-
Hello! Testing in a freshly downloaded copy of onedrive, single folder, download only and resync. Using default config file except for skip_file which is blank (because there are some files that needed syncing named like the default filter)
First HTTP call to get file information
A few calls later, it reaches the offending file
And the corresponding warning just after
And there is some information about the folder 146271
And that folder is directly inside the root (246). After some digging in Google about the meaning of the "hardDeleted" value I came across this post So... Is there a way of configuring the docker to avoid having OneDrive return information about the vault? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Not with v2.4.x and this will not be investigated. Please test / try building v2.5.x RC2 as this have been totally rewritten and it would be interesting to understand how this is being handled. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@futymax My test account as the following files in the vault: With v2.4.25 , the following occurs:
With v2.5.x (specifically RC2 at the moment) , the following occurs:
So in v2.4.x, the API data is analysed, and the Personal Vault items kick out a warning that there is no hash In v2.5.x, the API data is analysed, and items that are hard deleted or in the Vault are correctly handled without a warning message being displayed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I run some tests today, can confirm v2.5 does not display a warning. Thank you! p.s: Is there any time window estimate for v2.5 release? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@futymax
So to fully answer this, there is zero issue with v2.5.x code for this problem.
My test account as the following files in the vault:
With v2.4.25 , the following occurs: