Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: !commands should return all commands #48

Open
AdamHebby opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Feature: !commands should return all commands #48

AdamHebby opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@AdamHebby
Copy link
Contributor

Currently !commands just returns custom commands and not all commands including GlimBoi commands

@aMytho
Copy link
Owner

aMytho commented Mar 8, 2021

The reason I didn't add it was because it would quickly bypass the length limit for chat messages. We need to get a handler for that, either choose to separate the message or another solution. Currently if a message is too long the bot just sends an error to chat.

@AdamHebby
Copy link
Contributor Author

We could paginate them, or link to glimboi.com for default commands? Or allow the user to replace the !commands response with a URL

@AdamHebby
Copy link
Contributor Author

If we link to GlimBoi.com, I would link to an entirely separate page to what we already have, as the avg user doesn't need to know about parameters

@aMytho
Copy link
Owner

aMytho commented Mar 8, 2021

Maybe !commands help for glimboi commands. Then we could use !commands for normal commands. Pagination is probably the way to go.

@aMytho
Copy link
Owner

aMytho commented Mar 8, 2021

or !commands default

@aMytho
Copy link
Owner

aMytho commented Mar 8, 2021

Glimboi.com has some docs but I haven't updated it in a while

@AdamHebby
Copy link
Contributor Author

I dont mind either or tbh, I can paginate it relatively easily if that's what we wanna do. But I do think we should allow the user to give a URL if they have their own commands list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants