You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have noticed the StreamingFCLayer generated by FINN can sometimes be very inefficient in BRAM instantiation. It seems that for 8-bit FC layers with more than 48 neurons or 48 input activations, threshold memories in the StreamingFCLayer are implemented with many instances of BRAMs, with very low utilisation efficiency in each BRAM (e.g. WBitsBanks = 2176 for a BRAM_18 instance). Specifying ram_style = "distributed" doesn't seem to solve this issue.
I really appreciate any help on this issue! Thanks.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi,
I have noticed the StreamingFCLayer generated by FINN can sometimes be very inefficient in BRAM instantiation. It seems that for 8-bit FC layers with more than 48 neurons or 48 input activations, threshold memories in the StreamingFCLayer are implemented with many instances of BRAMs, with very low utilisation efficiency in each BRAM (e.g. WBitsBanks = 2176 for a BRAM_18 instance). Specifying ram_style = "distributed" doesn't seem to solve this issue.
I really appreciate any help on this issue! Thanks.
Here's an example synthesis report of StreamingFCLayer with input width of 64 and 64 neurons attached.
Synthesis Report for 'Matrix_Vector_Activa'.pdf
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions