Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lossless simplification? #37

Open
BradFitz66 opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Lossless simplification? #37

BradFitz66 opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@BradFitz66
Copy link

I have a 3D tile based map editor tool that I use to quickly create stuff for my game (building interiors, etc). At the start of runtime, I have to merge all these tiles into one big mesh because otherwise there's a huge performance drop (thousands+ of tiles. Static batching doesn't really help either, especially with post-processing is also on). This mesh, however has a lot of triangles that don't really need to be there, causing the mesh to have a lot more triangles than it needs.

The solution I feel that would be best for this is some sort of variant(?) of the Greedy Mesh algorithm made to work on arbitrary meshes instead of voxels (Greedy Meshing is mostly/solely used in minecraft-esque games).

@BradFitz66 BradFitz66 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants