You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IMHO just going in spirals is not interesting enough, and it also takes more time than necessary.
Maybe create gates in a more optimized fashion?
For example, choosing adjacent gate to be created next, with some directional preference, works a bit faster and looks better IMHO. (It feels like the assembler understands your design a bit, e.g. it draws whole tracks at once.)
An example (suboptimal) implementation (which I use myself) can be found in my pull request #115 .
Maybe one can come up with a better solution.
Or can just say that nobody cares :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IMHO just going in spirals is not interesting enough, and it also takes more time than necessary.
Maybe create gates in a more optimized fashion?
For example, choosing adjacent gate to be created next, with some directional preference, works a bit faster and looks better IMHO. (It feels like the assembler understands your design a bit, e.g. it draws whole tracks at once.)
An example (suboptimal) implementation (which I use myself) can be found in my pull request #115 .
Maybe one can come up with a better solution.
Or can just say that nobody cares :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: