Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison with ML approach #63

Open
VForiel opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comparison with ML approach #63

VForiel opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@VForiel
Copy link
Owner

VForiel commented May 29, 2024

Another way of finding the good shifts to introduce is to generate a dataset containing series of kernel nuller input and outputs and the perfects shifts that should be injected and then train a dense neural network to find out the good shifts.

A possible advantage of this method is that it can avoid any kernel swapping or kernel reversing (as discussed in #53 ) de to the supervised nature of the training (we build the dataset only with direct solutions)

A drawback is the the output of such neural network is a random variable statistically distributed around the output we are searching for. However, the solution can be used as initial guess to run the classical calibration algorithm, which can converge to the nearest solution without having to scan the entire parameter space.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant