You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently introduced a method that gives a map of possible contribution coming from the sky that allows to get the data we got.
A similar technic exist, consisting in trying to fit the planet modulated signal over all the possible positions in the field of view and dress a correlation map between these fits and the data we have.
It can be interesting to compare if both methods give the same results, and if not, how wich is the besto ne or how can we combine these methods to have something more interesting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recently introduced a method that gives a map of possible contribution coming from the sky that allows to get the data we got.
A similar technic exist, consisting in trying to fit the planet modulated signal over all the possible positions in the field of view and dress a correlation map between these fits and the data we have.
It can be interesting to compare if both methods give the same results, and if not, how wich is the besto ne or how can we combine these methods to have something more interesting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: