template: feedback for reproducing other's project

[nehamoopen]

1. Which project did you reproduce (include the link!)?

->

2. Does the project have the following on its Github repository:

• A Readme with information about the project
• A license
• Citation information
• Requirements for running the code (dependencies)
• An understandable folder structure

3. What did you appreciate about the project's repository?

->

4. Do you have any suggestions for improvement to the repo?

->

5. Did you manage to run the project successfully?

• Yes
• Largely
• No
• Other:

6. What went right?

->

7. What did you need to adjust for the project to (try to) run?

• I had to install dependencies that were clearly indicated in the requirements/readme
• I had to install dependencies that were not indicated anywhere
• I had to change the code in some places
• Other:

8. Where did you have to give up reproducing this repo (if applicable)?

->

9. Did you have to go into the code?

• Yes
• No
• I didn't have to, but I had time left/was intrigued, so I did it anyway!

10. If you looked at the code: what did you like?

->

11. If you looked at the code, what would be a single line of advice you want to pass on to its author:

->

12. Any final comments to the author:

->

11. Do you think the class will benefit from a live demo of the reproduction of this project? Why/what can we learn?

->

---

[nehamoopen]

Linked to #20