You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Good question. This is part of a major question we will need to address in
UCCA: redundancy. I don't think we have clear guidelines for this yet but I
would annotate it as one scene.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, 01:52 Jakob Prange, ***@***.***> wrote:
Sometimes the main point of a sentence is reiterated as a sort of fragment
or ellipsis:
I am afraid .
Really afraid .
Since UCCA doesn't really have a strict notion of 'sentence', should this
be treated as one scene or two (with remote edge)?
[ I_A am_F [ afraid_C ... afraid_C ]_S Really_D ]_H
vs
[ I_A am_F afraid_S ]_H [ Really_D afraid_S (I)_A ]_H
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#61>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACA3Z227K3PAISWQHELUIH3PRY6TRANCNFSM4HHTHOWQ>
.
Sometimes the main point of a sentence is reiterated as a sort of fragment or ellipsis:
Since UCCA doesn't really have a strict notion of 'sentence', should this be treated as one scene or two (with remote edge)?
[ I_A am_F [ afraid_C ... afraid_C ]_S Really_D ]_H
vs
[ I_A am_F afraid_S ]_H [ Really_D afraid_S (I)_A ]_H
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: