You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great work, quite interesting.
I wonder have you ever tried to experiment with small-scale datasets? Imagenet it rather big to try as you know.
Best.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately, no. We believe CIFAR is too small to be helpful for comparing SSL methods. You could use the ImageNet-100 subset (~125k) from Contrastive Multiview Coding. I have ran a modified version of MSF on this dataset for 500 epochs and obtained around 83% linear layer accuracy. Still, 500 epochs on ImageNet-100 is large compared to CIFAR, but it is necessary. Comparison of methods with less number of epochs ignores delayed convergence of some methods. There is no quick and easy path to get results in SSL research these days.
Thanks for your great work, quite interesting.
I wonder have you ever tried to experiment with small-scale datasets? Imagenet it rather big to try as you know.
Best.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: