-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Which question to ask, what model to use for it, and what assumptions we are making for that model #2
Comments
Action items:
|
Action items:
|
@mishelly-h would you mind adding the data file and word doc for the data key, and add the .gitignore file for .csv and .doc/docx as well? |
Tiffany's reply on the main goal of this group assignment: |
2023.11.16 Lunch Break Independent Variable: Dependent Variable: question: |
We agreed to constrain the scope of our question to keep it simple. Our null hypothesis is that self-perception of attractiveness is accurate (there is no significant difference between self vs external attractiveness ratings). Our alternative hypothesis is that self-perception of attractiveness is inaccurate (there is a difference between self vs external attractiveness ratings). |
Task list:
|
I realized we didn't discuss creating the renv file, as well as the references and README files. @wenyunie, would you be okay with populating a renv file once you finish the preliminary analyses? I can start populating a references file (I'll include what I needed to cite for the methods section) and work on what I can in the README project file for you guys to review. |
Yes, for sure. |
How do you guys want to do the citations? We could either setup a bibliography file or we can do it manually since this project is not that big and we do not have that many references. is that the references file that you mentioned? |
Oh good call - I was just gonna manually format it into APA (I think the
methods section only has 2-3 references). Alternatively we can also share
references on something like Zotero before porting it over. Rory and
Michelle, since you two are gonna have more references to deal with, what
would work better for you?
…On Fri, Nov 17, 2023, 1:26 p.m. mishelly-h ***@***.***> wrote:
How do you guys want to do the citations? We could either setup a
bibliography file or we can do it manually since this project is not that
big and we do not have that many references.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2DL32HFTTTPSPTMIYH3ATYE7JAZAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7DZLY4KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJXGEZDOOJWHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I am perfectly fine to just do it manually since the project is not that big and figure out the automated way of referencing later. But if the anyone has strong preferences towards doing it automatically, I am open to do so. |
Hello Michelle and all, I am happy to do this manually. APA style works for me. |
Okay sounds good! Give me 15 mins and I'll push what I have to the repo.
…On Fri, Nov 17, 2023, 3:28 p.m. rorywhite200 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello Michelle and all, I am happy to do this manually. APA style works
for me.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2DL34VYHTATCAC7YAWJDDYE7XLNAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7DZLY4KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJXGI2DMOJYHE>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi everyone, just wanted to let you know that the following are up to date on my end:
I've also updated the README file to include a skeleton for the project file (for details, see pull request). I'm going to open a new branch for sharing the final report file (I'm planning to call it |
Hi everyone, I finished the analysis and plot part. Can anyone make a review to the pull request and see it is approvable? |
We chose the speed dating data set, we found the data set interesting but also very challenging, because of the potential cofounding and how it is difficult to solve these problems with the currently learned models.
3.Self-rating v.s. other rating, level of analysis not decided
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: