Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which question to ask, what model to use for it, and what assumptions we are making for that model #2

Open
wenyunie opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 16 comments
Labels
to do A to do list for members to keep track of action items

Comments

@wenyunie
Copy link
Collaborator

wenyunie commented Nov 9, 2023

We chose the speed dating data set, we found the data set interesting but also very challenging, because of the potential cofounding and how it is difficult to solve these problems with the currently learned models.

  1. Each rating is an observation and see what's the predictive power of each attribute on if the overall rating is Yes or No
  2. Each rate person is an observation and what's the predictive power of each attribute on if the overall rating (we will find a way to calculate the summed score from different raters on this person)
    3.Self-rating v.s. other rating, level of analysis not decided
@monazhu monazhu added the to do A to do list for members to keep track of action items label Nov 9, 2023
@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 9, 2023

Action items:

  • Mona to do: draft up a code of conduct file for team members to approve/review
  • Wait for TIffany to get back to us before deciding which question/analyses to conduct

@mishelly-h
Copy link
Collaborator

Action items:

  • setup repository structure

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 9, 2023

@mishelly-h would you mind adding the data file and word doc for the data key, and add the .gitignore file for .csv and .doc/docx as well?

@wenyunie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We chose the speed dating data set, we found the data set interesting but also very challenging, because of the potential cofounding and how it is difficult to solve these problems with the currently learned models.

  1. Each rating is an observation and see what's the predictive power of each attribute on if the overall rating is Yes or No
  2. Each rate person is an observation and what's the predictive power of each attribute on if the overall rating (we will find a way to calculate the summed score from different raters on this person)
    3.Self-rating v.s. other rating, level of analysis not decided

Tiffany's reply on the main goal of this group assignment:
https://ubc-mds.slack.com/archives/C24HUNRJL/p1699553458680469?thread_ts=1699492423.893409&cid=C24HUNRJL

@wenyunie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

2023.11.16 Lunch Break

Independent Variable:
self rating v.s. other rating

Dependent Variable:
an attribute of interest we are going to pick from the survey

question:
Are self-rating and other-rating different for Attribute XXX in the context of speed dating?

@rorywhite200
Copy link
Collaborator

We agreed to constrain the scope of our question to keep it simple. Our null hypothesis is that self-perception of attractiveness is accurate (there is no significant difference between self vs external attractiveness ratings). Our alternative hypothesis is that self-perception of attractiveness is inaccurate (there is a difference between self vs external attractiveness ratings).

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 16, 2023

Task list:

  • Michelle: introduction (including literature search + stating the hypothesis) + summary
  • Mona: Methods (summarizing data and analysis)
  • Wenyu: Results (EDA + analysis + plots)
  • Rory: Discussion (including literature search)

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 17, 2023

I realized we didn't discuss creating the renv file, as well as the references and README files.

@wenyunie, would you be okay with populating a renv file once you finish the preliminary analyses?

I can start populating a references file (I'll include what I needed to cite for the methods section) and work on what I can in the README project file for you guys to review.

@wenyunie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I realized we didn't discuss creating the renv file, as well as the references and README files.

@wenyunie, would you be okay with populating a renv file once you finish the preliminary analyses?

I can start populating a references file (I'll include what I needed to cite for the methods section) and work on what I can in the README project file for you guys to review.

Yes, for sure.

@mishelly-h
Copy link
Collaborator

mishelly-h commented Nov 17, 2023

How do you guys want to do the citations? We could either setup a bibliography file or we can do it manually since this project is not that big and we do not have that many references. is that the references file that you mentioned?

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 17, 2023 via email

@mishelly-h
Copy link
Collaborator

I am perfectly fine to just do it manually since the project is not that big and figure out the automated way of referencing later. But if the anyone has strong preferences towards doing it automatically, I am open to do so.

@rorywhite200
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello Michelle and all, I am happy to do this manually. APA style works for me.

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 17, 2023 via email

@monazhu
Copy link
Collaborator

monazhu commented Nov 18, 2023

Hi everyone, just wanted to let you know that the following are up to date on my end:

  • 02-method.Rmd
  • 05-references.Rmd

I've also updated the README file to include a skeleton for the project file (for details, see pull request). I'm going to open a new branch for sharing the final report file (I'm planning to call it analysis_report.Rmd for now but feel free to change the name later). This is mostly to ensure that the parent/child document is working as expected.

@wenyunie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi everyone, I finished the analysis and plot part. Can anyone make a review to the pull request and see it is approvable?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
to do A to do list for members to keep track of action items
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants