You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
When the file is split into 256-byte blocks attacker can identify the blocks or parts of blocks that contain the same data (but not the data itself). Every individual byte with the same value and the same relative position in the block will always encrypt to the same output value, attacker will encounter false positives but this could still be very helpful to them.
Example with 4-byte blocks:
AAAAABCDGFGAAAAA -> FABDFCCEABADFABD (it might look random at first glance, but it's not)
Input: [(A)AA(A)] (A)BCD GFG(A) [AAAA]
Output: [(F)AB(D)] (F)CCE ABB(D) [FABD]
This will be fixed in the future release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TypicalHog
changed the title
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns within 256-byte blocks
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns within the encrypted file
Jun 9, 2018
TypicalHog
changed the title
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns within the encrypted file
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns in the encrypted file
Jun 9, 2018
TypicalHog
changed the title
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns in the encrypted file
[Vulnerability] Repeating patterns in encrypted files
Jun 10, 2018
When the file is split into 256-byte blocks attacker can identify the blocks or parts of blocks that contain the same data (but not the data itself). Every individual byte with the same value and the same relative position in the block will always encrypt to the same output value, attacker will encounter false positives but this could still be very helpful to them.
Example with 4-byte blocks:
This will be fixed in the future release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: