You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Quoting a longer text now creates huge URLs, which could easily be shortened while remaining uniquely resolvable. The most traditional and human-readable approach would be ellipsis: "ipsum dolor ... diam lectus.".
Possibly extra information could be added to increase robustness and verify the contents are correct. A hash of the string, or maybe just the length of the omitted part. I feel however that robustness to text modifications should be accomplished at a higher (document-)level, and making sure that the quote identifier was unambiguous in the first place is a matter that must be solved generally (issue #1; disambiguation could in this case be achieved by adding prefix/suffix as well as by removing less quoted words).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Quoting a longer text now creates huge URLs, which could easily be shortened while remaining uniquely resolvable. The most traditional and human-readable approach would be ellipsis:
"ipsum dolor ... diam lectus."
.Possibly extra information could be added to increase robustness and verify the contents are correct. A hash of the string, or maybe just the length of the omitted part. I feel however that robustness to text modifications should be accomplished at a higher (document-)level, and making sure that the quote identifier was unambiguous in the first place is a matter that must be solved generally (issue #1; disambiguation could in this case be achieved by adding prefix/suffix as well as by removing less quoted words).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: