You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing a great work.
I'm trying to reproduce the performance of InternLM-XComposer2 + DPO + VLFeedback, but I found that the baseline performance (InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b) you reported is slightly different from the performance in the original paper.
Can I know why?
Also, the dpo_internlmxc2vl7b.sh file in ./scripts folder is the command for reproducing your InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b-DPO model?
If not, could you share the script file or config file to reproduce InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b-DPO model.
Thank you again for the nice work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The evaluation scores are obtained from VLMEval, you can download the ckpt and evaluate yourself to see if the score matches. I am not sure the reported numbers can be 100% reproduced given the numeric inconsistency across platforms
Hi,
Thank you for sharing a great work.
I'm trying to reproduce the performance of InternLM-XComposer2 + DPO + VLFeedback, but I found that the baseline performance (InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b) you reported is slightly different from the performance in the original paper.
Can I know why?
Also, the dpo_internlmxc2vl7b.sh file in ./scripts folder is the command for reproducing your InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b-DPO model?
If not, could you share the script file or config file to reproduce InternLM-Xcomposer2-VL-7b-DPO model.
Thank you again for the nice work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: