You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having PrimeFaces, ButterFaces and OmniFaces along with BootsFaces on the showcase clutters the classpath and we run the risk of some of those libraries changing some behavior without our knowledge.
I propose to separate the showcase into 3 different wars, deployed on the following context roots:
/showcase: bootsfaces+omnifaces
/showcase/primefaces: bsf+of+primefaces
/showcase/butterfaces: bsf+of+butterfaces
I think we can remain using OmniFaces as it is a must for every new JSF application anyway. It solves some problems and I think we should even recomend to use it.
I think Maven can be instructed to output different artifacts from just one compilation like if it was an EAR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another option is to drop support for ButterFaces because of two reasons: we don't have enough developers to really support it, and BootsFaces has recently acquired many components previously offered exclusively by ButterFaces. On the other hand, I'm not sure I really want to do this to Lars Michaelis.
Having PrimeFaces, ButterFaces and OmniFaces along with BootsFaces on the showcase clutters the classpath and we run the risk of some of those libraries changing some behavior without our knowledge.
I propose to separate the showcase into 3 different wars, deployed on the following context roots:
I think we can remain using OmniFaces as it is a must for every new JSF application anyway. It solves some problems and I think we should even recomend to use it.
I think Maven can be instructed to output different artifacts from just one compilation like if it was an EAR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: