You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
Hi,
I find that clusters with more cells tends to have more ligand-receptor interactions with other clusters. I think the more the cells are, the more the ligand and receptor expression will be detected. Does this make sense ? It this is the case, how to eliminate the cell number effects ? And, is the interactions identified by cellphonedb a quantitative indicator or a qualitative indicators ? Can I compare the interaction numbers between two conditions (such as the interaction numbers between cluster A and cluster B under healthy and disease samples, similar to differential gene expression identification)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi,
I find that clusters with more cells tends to have more ligand-receptor interactions with other clusters. I think the more the cells are, the more the ligand and receptor expression will be detected. Does this make sense ? It this is the case, how to eliminate the cell number effects ? And, is the interactions identified by cellphonedb a quantitative indicator or a qualitative indicators ? Can I compare the interaction numbers between two conditions (such as the interaction numbers between cluster A and cluster B under healthy and disease samples, similar to differential gene expression identification)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: