Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add prior knowledge in harmony function? #7

Open
yxwucq opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add prior knowledge in harmony function? #7

yxwucq opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@yxwucq
Copy link

yxwucq commented Jul 31, 2024

Thank you for this fantastic method which fills the blank in group-level integration. I suggest the method uses group-pratition information rather than group annotation information. Honestly, like your article mentioned that sometimes the skewed annotation may get flawed result. But may it still helpful to add the annotation information as prior?

Practically, instead of hard annotation, LLM can be used to convert annotation to embeddings and then contributes to mapping matrix with prior-weights.

Do you think it's worth to be included into the packages?

@ChuanXu1
Copy link
Collaborator

ChuanXu1 commented Aug 7, 2024

@yxwucq, sounds interesting. Can you point me to a paper or document that uses LLM for such purpose? THX!

@yxwucq
Copy link
Author

yxwucq commented Aug 8, 2024

Actually no one has done such things before according to my knowledge lol. I've forked the repo https://github.com/yxwucq/cellhint to implement it. I created this forked version mainly because I wanted it to be the downstream of my project: https://github.com/yxwucq/scExtract. Performance was increased but not significantly, depending on the quality of annotations. Maybe it's better to stay as fork version?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants