Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

falling back to "source" files #117

Closed
kberry opened this issue Oct 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

falling back to "source" files #117

kberry opened this issue Oct 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@kberry
Copy link
Contributor

kberry commented Oct 13, 2024

Hi Takuto. Would you consider having texdoc fall back to looking in the source/ tree (kpathsea search type "source") if no good matches are found in doc?

In current TL (Texdoc 4.1 (2024-03-10), texdoc fontscripts doesn't find anything. This is because I installed all files in the package in the source/ tree. It seemed more useful for users to keep everything together than to split off the pdf and README into doc. Since anyone actually considering using the package would want to see the source files.

Over the years, I've done this for a few other packages in a similar situation (apl, bibtexperllibs, bibtools, hyphenex, metatype1). For some of these, texdoc finds files in another package; for others, it finds nothing.

Thanks for considering.

@wtsnjp wtsnjp added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Oct 17, 2024
@wtsnjp
Copy link
Member

wtsnjp commented Oct 17, 2024

Hi Karl, thanks for the suggestion. I think this is one of the nice future plans we have. To me this seems identical to #47.

@wtsnjp
Copy link
Member

wtsnjp commented Nov 26, 2024

Closing because this is a duplicated issue.

@wtsnjp wtsnjp closed this as completed Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants