Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Directly parse the brush instead of using the converter object. #46

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

GreemDev
Copy link
Contributor

The converter type is moreso for conforming to a specific API, for the "constants" at the top of this file we don't need to use a converter. Especially when all that converter does is literally just Brush.Parse anyways.

@ArchLeaders
Copy link
Member

This looks great, thanks. Any idea if this has anything to do with #45?

@ArchLeaders ArchLeaders merged commit 8d9f549 into TKMM-Team:master Aug 27, 2024
@GreemDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

This looks great, thanks. Any idea if this has anything to do with #45?

I don't. I just PRed it because it was a change I made in Volte and I figured you would like it considering code clarity & cleanliness :p

@ArchLeaders
Copy link
Member

Ah fair enough. I didn't think it would be relevant, but I thought I'd ask because I'm not really sure where to go with that issue.

@GreemDev GreemDev deleted the brushparse branch August 29, 2024 17:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants