You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actually, get_noise_levels makes internal use of get_random_data_chunks that is not parallel. There is thus room for improvements, via parallelization. This could be achieved at low cost by using the run_node_pipeline machinery, assuming some patch like #2011 would be accepted. If this is the case (or we can discuss somehting in line and similar), one could simply provide a list of fake "peak" times, some temporal window, and use the WaveformDense object of the pipeline to get data in parallel. Adding an extra job_kwargs to get_noise_levels would then speed up everything. @samuelgarcia what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, get_noise_levels makes internal use of get_random_data_chunks that is not parallel. There is thus room for improvements, via parallelization. This could be achieved at low cost by using the run_node_pipeline machinery, assuming some patch like #2011 would be accepted. If this is the case (or we can discuss somehting in line and similar), one could simply provide a list of fake "peak" times, some temporal window, and use the WaveformDense object of the pipeline to get data in parallel. Adding an extra job_kwargs to get_noise_levels would then speed up everything. @samuelgarcia what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: