You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2020. It is now read-only.
Given NES's unique issues regarding headers, it would be preferable if header-bypassed hashes could be supported by HD Packs, both in generation (supportedRom tag) and in patch application (patch tag). Obviously this won't work with bps patches (barring unnecessary adjustments), but for ips it could remove quite a bit of headache. For compatibility reasons, it would be best if header-inclusive hashes still functioned as well. While I don't think any HD packs exist with headerless patches yet, it may be necessary to have a secondary patch syntax to prevent conflicts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sanaki
changed the title
[Feature Request] Support headerless hashes for HD Packs
[Feature Request] Support bypassing headers in HD Pack hashes
Jul 15, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Given NES's unique issues regarding headers, it would be preferable if header-bypassed hashes could be supported by HD Packs, both in generation (supportedRom tag) and in patch application (patch tag). Obviously this won't work with bps patches (barring unnecessary adjustments), but for ips it could remove quite a bit of headache. For compatibility reasons, it would be best if header-inclusive hashes still functioned as well. While I don't think any HD packs exist with headerless patches yet, it may be necessary to have a secondary patch syntax to prevent conflicts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: