We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
我看这个 EXTENSION_INSTANCES 只是用来实例化,那么能不能改成这样? 难道只是因为 putIfAbsent 是原子性的?在进入方法之前,不也用 synchronized 加锁了?
private T createExtension(String name) { // 从加载类缓存中获取 class 对象 Class<?> clazz = getExtensionClasses().get(name); if (clazz == null) { throw new RuntimeException("No such extension of name " + name); } T instance = null; try { instance = (T) clazz.newInstance(); } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException e) { log.error(e.getMessage()); } return instance; }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
而且dubbo里面也是这么写,只是多了一个摧毁的操作
Sorry, something went wrong.
我感觉源码里面就是ioc思想,一个类创建一次就好了,可以一直用,你每次用的时候都创建一个新的,效率多低
No branches or pull requests
我看这个 EXTENSION_INSTANCES 只是用来实例化,那么能不能改成这样?
难道只是因为 putIfAbsent 是原子性的?在进入方法之前,不也用 synchronized 加锁了?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: