Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate inconsistent raster subsetting performance #351

Open
jpswinski opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate inconsistent raster subsetting performance #351

jpswinski opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@jpswinski
Copy link
Member

When running the rasterized subsetting benchmark on v4.0.2 (which does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) we consistently see timing numbers between 16 and 19 seconds.

When running on @elidwa's development machine, the benchmark on main 5fc9711 (which also does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) runs in just under 8 seconds, while the benchmark using the optimized GeoJsonCode that is optimized d1e776b runs in just over 6 seconds.

When running on @jpswinski's development machine (which is an identical instance type to @elidwa's), we see the optimized code run in just under 4 seconds.

We need to investigate why there is this large disparity between the benchmarking runs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant