You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running the rasterized subsetting benchmark on v4.0.2 (which does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) we consistently see timing numbers between 16 and 19 seconds.
When running on @elidwa's development machine, the benchmark on main 5fc9711 (which also does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) runs in just under 8 seconds, while the benchmark using the optimized GeoJsonCode that is optimized d1e776b runs in just over 6 seconds.
When running on @jpswinski's development machine (which is an identical instance type to @elidwa's), we see the optimized code run in just under 4 seconds.
We need to investigate why there is this large disparity between the benchmarking runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When running the rasterized subsetting benchmark on v4.0.2 (which does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) we consistently see timing numbers between 16 and 19 seconds.
When running on @elidwa's development machine, the benchmark on main 5fc9711 (which also does not have the optimized GeoJsonRaster code) runs in just under 8 seconds, while the benchmark using the optimized GeoJsonCode that is optimized d1e776b runs in just over 6 seconds.
When running on @jpswinski's development machine (which is an identical instance type to @elidwa's), we see the optimized code run in just under 4 seconds.
We need to investigate why there is this large disparity between the benchmarking runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: