You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now the links in sefaria can point to a text in a limited precision, lets take an example: https://www.sefaria.org.il/Jerusalem_Talmud_Shabbat.3.6.2?lang=he
This is a link to a pretty long Halakha in Jerusalem Talmud, and I have no option to share a specific place inside of this Halakha.
(Same is correct for Sharing a part of Passuk etc.).
This would be very useful in sharing more accurate references or saving a "bookmark" where I stop.
Disadvantages
One important disadvantage I can think of is that this feature would not work precisely when switching languages, because the 100th word in Hebrew is not exactly the 100th word in English.
Implementation
I think this would not be a hard feature, It requires only some changes in the frontend:
Mark the required word when opening such a link.
A share\save button with the correct index when double tapping or highlighting a word.
I think I can do this, I just want to hear what you have to say about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now the links in sefaria can point to a text in a limited precision, lets take an example:
https://www.sefaria.org.il/Jerusalem_Talmud_Shabbat.3.6.2?lang=he
This is a link to a pretty long Halakha in Jerusalem Talmud, and I have no option to share a specific place inside of this Halakha.
(Same is correct for Sharing a part of Passuk etc.).
My proposal is to add an option specify a word inside any section, by the index of the word. For example I can modify the link above to point to word number 100:
https://www.sefaria.org.il/Jerusalem_Talmud_Shabbat.3.6.2:100?lang=he
This would be very useful in sharing more accurate references or saving a "bookmark" where I stop.
Disadvantages
Implementation
I think this would not be a hard feature, It requires only some changes in the frontend:
I think I can do this, I just want to hear what you have to say about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: