Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve keyboard controls with diagonal keys #2

Open
ByteCommander opened this issue Sep 22, 2015 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #7
Open

Improve keyboard controls with diagonal keys #2

ByteCommander opened this issue Sep 22, 2015 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #7

Comments

@ByteCommander
Copy link

I came across this addicting minigame on lichess.org/404 and really love it, but what annoys me is that there are currently no keys to walk diagonally. You have to press +/ or W+A/Dtogether.

I would propose to add Q and E for the WASD control (maybe also Y/Z and X or C for diagonal backwards).

You could also add a new controls set and enable the use of the numpad, where you can ideally use all numbers but 5 to move the king into the respective direction.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 28, 2015

It should definitely bind the numpad keys for 8-way movement, roguelike style -- so to cover all directions. I don't necessarily agree with theproposed use of 5 though.

@Unihedro
Copy link

The proposed use of 5 is that it does nothing. I think it can act as a "keep moving in the same direction" control.

@ByteCommander
Copy link
Author

@Unihedro Why would that be useful? It does not hurt, but I don't see the point if the real button is just next to it. This is probably more confusing beginners than really helpful...

@Unihedro
Copy link

A control will not be confusing just because it has no point. A control will only be confusing if it is misplaced from its inferred purpose, which is exactly what will happen if the x, y and z keys are used to navigate diagonally.

@CD12345 CD12345 linked a pull request May 29, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants