You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently STIXType contains list types (e.g. IndicatorsType) for each top-level construct that are nothing but containers for 1..* instances of that type.
Propose flattening these to simply be of the contained object type with a 0..* multiplicity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This seems an interesting approach for simplification.
Meantime that would (maybe) also avoid the work of reviewing the (as of now not existing) naming convention for these list types
For now: +1 for me
Currently STIXType contains list types (e.g. IndicatorsType) for each top-level construct that are nothing but containers for 1..* instances of that type.
Propose flattening these to simply be of the contained object type with a 0..* multiplicity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: