Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Further improvements to field mapping #566

Open
Jdgilby opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Further improvements to field mapping #566

Jdgilby opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Jdgilby
Copy link
Collaborator

Jdgilby commented Jan 27, 2025

The recent release addressed issue #552, however this only address categorical fields, not numerical. There isnt currently a good pathway/workflow to deal with numerical fields which often have a bunch of different values. Batch edit wouldn't make sense for unique values, field mapping doesnt work, and manual edits through the form would be too time consuming.

Image
I'm suggesting the possibility to map the attribute itself for numerical values. No value mapping is needed for the numerical data. So Under the field mapper Id want to specify that attribute "length" from the temporary layer = "Length" from the QRIS layer. No need to individual select values.

Currently we get this dialog for this example.

Image

When trying to map I only get categorical fields as an option.

Image
There needs to be the ability to add the field from the temporary layer, and I'm suggesting you don't need to map the actual numbers, they just get copied from one field to the new one.

@Jdgilby Jdgilby added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants