-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kind systems #24
Comments
Do you mean, types satisfying regularity? I thought we didn't think this was a useful kind. |
We thought they were useless in the presence of discrete types, but now without equality types (in this proof theory) discrete types seem useless. So, maybe there is room for us to reconsider regular types. |
Ah, I see. I have never thought seriously about their proof theory, and I don't think @mortberg has either? |
I have not, it would be interesting to have this though. I think some examples can be done in the regular fragment which should be more efficient. |
It is unclear whether we want regular types, but we need to have a kind system first. |
Do we have a good proof theory for them? @cangiuli @mortberg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: