You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In rh-table we are using transparencies with various crayon tokens. Even though we try and avoid using crayons in components, we are using them there because they provide RGB values to which we can apply opacity.
We are also using #FFFFFF or --rh-color-white which does not provide RGB values. I have created a --_rh-color-white-rgbprivate var as a place holder for now.
Should we though ensure all base crayon colors have RGB values?
Do we think we should abstract these RGB values into overlay tokens which provide could provide additional semantic layer so they would be used in a component instead of the crayon? I envision some difficulty in abstracting the color values + opacity level in doing so to the name of the tokens.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
rh-table
we are using transparencies with various crayon tokens. Even though we try and avoid using crayons in components, we are using them there because they provide RGB values to which we can apply opacity.We are also using
#FFFFFF
or--rh-color-white
which does not provide RGB values. I have created a--_rh-color-white-rgb
private var as a place holder for now.Should we though ensure all base crayon colors have RGB values?
Do we think we should abstract these RGB values into overlay tokens which provide could provide additional semantic layer so they would be used in a component instead of the crayon? I envision some difficulty in abstracting the color values + opacity level in doing so to the name of the tokens.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: